Angry Animal 8

We're too lazy to install real blog software and don't believe in the "cloud", so this page will serve as a focal point for offering our comments and rebuttal to various security related blogs, articles or tweets that demand more than a 140 character response. Please read the original article being rebutted to understand the author's point of view. These replies are not (typically) meant to be a "you are wrong, we are right", rather to add perspective and commentary. Or the replies may make personal or ad hominem attacks, because we're selectively juvenile and immature.



11.07.25 - Rebuttal: We Are InfoSec Professionals... Not The Beatles [Malik, Infosec Island]

11.07.11 - Rebuttal: Matthew Hughes, Puppy Kicker [@matthewhughes]

11.07.08 - Rebuttal: The Pyrrhic Benefit of FUD [Jorgensen, Infosec Island]

11.07.07 - Rebuttal: Microsoft, Unhackable and Ridiculous [John Howie, Microsoft]

11.06.28 - Rebuttal: Paul C Dwyer, ICTTF and LulzSec

11.06.24 - Rebuttal: Ponemon on Network Breaches [Richmond/Ponemon]

11.06.23 - Rebuttal: Northrop Grumman, Cyber-gangs, APT and 0-day [Messmer]

11.06.17 - Rebuttal: The difference between curmudgeon and curmudgeon [@shrdlu]

11.06.16 - Rebuttal: LulzSec Ups The Ante [Brian Honan]

11.05.27 - A Curmudgeonly Reply to an Anti-Curmudgeon Rant (in two parts)










main page ATTRITION feedback